Can you imagine how Priestley would have conducted the experiment using a candle and a plant? Remember, he would need to rekindle the candle to test whether it burns after a few days. How many different ways can you think of to light the candle without disturbing the set-up?
Which of the following statements about early experiments in photosynthesis and their links to O₂ evolution are NOT correct? S1: Joseph Priestley's experiment established that a mint plant could reverse the damage to air caused by a burning candle, indicating oxygen production. S2: Jan Ingenhousz definitively identified the bubbles formed around aquatic plants in sunlight as oxygen. S3: T.W. Engelmann's experiment using aerobic bacteria provided direct evidence for the release of oxygen in specific spectral regions. S4: Julius von Sachs' work primarily demonstrated that plants, when growing, produce starch as a storage form of glucose, directly linking photosynthesis to glucose synthesis, not O2 evolution. S5: The experiment involving a variegated leaf showed that light is necessary for starch formation but did not directly link it to O2 evolution.
MedicNEET's Biology question bank is built from the same NCERT lines NTA picks repeatedly. Not random MCQs — questions crafted exactly like NTA crafts them.