Incomplete Dominance vs Codominance: Difference Explained (NEET)

Biology · Principles of Inheritance and Variation · NEET

In incomplete dominance, the two alleles mix to give a NEW in-between trait in the heterozygote, like a red flower and a white flower giving a PINK flower. In codominance, both alleles show up FULLY and separately at the same time, like the AB blood group where both A and B sugars appear on the red blood cells. Memory hook: incomplete = "mixed paint (pink)", codominance = "both flags flying (A and B)".
Incomplete Dominance vs CodominanceIncomplete DominanceSnapdragon flower colourRR Red+rr WhiteRr Pink (blend)CodominanceABO blood groupAIᴬIᴬ+BIᵇIᵇA|BIᴬIᵇ both
Left: incomplete dominance blends red and white into one new pink (Rr). Right: codominance shows both A and B fully and separately in the AB heterozygote (I^A I^B). Blend = incomplete; both together = co.

Your doubts, answered

What is the simplest difference between incomplete dominance and codominance?

In incomplete dominance, the heterozygote shows a NEW blended trait that is in-between the two parents (red + white = pink). Neither allele is fully seen; they mix. In codominance, the heterozygote shows BOTH traits fully and separately at the same time, with no blending (blood group AB has both A antigen and B antigen). Trick to remember: incomplete = blend (one new look), codominance = both (two looks together).

Is AB blood group an example of incomplete dominance or codominance?

AB blood group is CODOMINANCE, not incomplete dominance. This is a very common NEET trap. In a person with genotype I^A I^B, the I^A allele makes A-type sugar and the I^B allele makes B-type sugar, and BOTH sugars appear fully on the red blood cells. There is no blending into a 'mixed' sugar. NCERT states clearly: 'when I^A and I^B are present together they both express their own types of sugars: this is because of co-dominance.'

Why is pink snapdragon incomplete dominance and not codominance?

Because the heterozygote (Rr) is a single NEW colour, pink, which is a blend of red and white. You do not see red patches AND white patches on the same flower. If both colours appeared fully and separately, THAT would be codominance. Since red and white mix into one in-between colour (pink), it is incomplete dominance. The gene R is simply not completely dominant over r.

Do incomplete dominance and codominance follow Mendel's Law of Segregation?

Yes, both still follow the Law of Segregation. This confuses many students. The alleles still separate cleanly into gametes and pair up again. In snapdragon, the F2 genotype ratio is exactly 1 RR : 2 Rr : 1 rr, just like any normal monohybrid cross. What changes is only the Law of DOMINANCE, because the heterozygote does not look like one pure parent. The genotype ratio stays perfectly Mendelian.

What is the phenotypic ratio in incomplete dominance and codominance?

In incomplete dominance, the F2 phenotypic ratio is 1 : 2 : 1 (for snapdragon, 1 Red : 2 Pink : 1 White). This is the SAME as the genotype ratio because every genotype gives a different look. Codominance (like ABO) also gives 1 : 2 : 1 style genotype-matches-phenotype patterns because the heterozygote is distinct. So the key change in BOTH is: the 3 : 1 ratio of complete dominance becomes 1 : 2 : 1, because the heterozygote is now visible as its own class.

Are the alleles dominant or recessive in incomplete dominance and codominance?

In both cases, neither allele is fully dominant or fully recessive over the other, so both alleles show some effect in the heterozygote. The difference is HOW: in incomplete dominance they blend into one middle trait; in codominance they each show fully and separately. This is why the heterozygote is always distinguishable from both parents in both cases, which is why the 1:2:1 ratio appears.

⚠️ The NEET trap
AB blood group and pink snapdragon are both examples of incomplete dominance because neither allele is fully dominant.
Pink snapdragon is INCOMPLETE DOMINANCE (blended in-between trait). AB blood group is CODOMINANCE (both alleles express fully and separately). ABO blood grouping is the standard NEET example of codominance, never incomplete dominance.
🧠 NEET repeatedly pairs 'ABO blood group -> Codominance' and 'Antirrhinum/snapdragon -> Incomplete dominance'. If a match-the-column question links ABO to incomplete dominance, it is WRONG. Blend = incomplete; both = co.

Real NEET questions

NEET 2026

Match List I with List II: List-I: A. Incomplete dominance B. Co-dominance C. Pleiotropy D. Polygenic inheritance List-II: I. Human skin colour II. Inheritance of flower colour in Antirrhinum sp. III. Phenylketonuria disease in humans IV. ABO blood groups

A · A-II, B-IV, C-III, D-I
B · A-I, B-III, C-II, D-IV
C · A-I, B-IV, C-III, D-II
D · A-II, B-I, C-III, D-IV
Solution: Incomplete dominance is shown by flower colour in Antirrhinum (snapdragon), where the heterozygote is intermediate pink (A-II). Codominance is shown by ABO blood groups, where I^A and I^B both express fully (B-IV). Pleiotropy (one gene, many effects) is phenylketonuria (C-III), and polygenic inheritance is human skin colour (D-I). So the answer is A-II, B-IV, C-III, D-I.
NEET 2020

Identify the wrong statement with reference to the gene 'I' that controls ABO blood groups.

A · When I^A and I^B are present together, they express same type of sugar
B · Allele 'i' does not produce any sugar
C · The gene (I) has three alleles
D · A person will have only two of the three alleles
Solution: This is the WRONG statement. Because of codominance, when I^A and I^B are together, each expresses its OWN different sugar, so the red blood cells carry both A and B sugars, not the same sugar. If they had blended into one sugar it would be incomplete dominance, but ABO is codominance. The other three statements are all correct.
NEET 2019

In Antirrhinum (Snapdragon), a red flower was crossed with a white flower and in F1 generation pink flowers were obtained. When pink flowers were selfed, the F2 generation showed white, red and pink flowers. Choose the incorrect statement from the following:

A · This experiment does not follow the Principle of Dominance.
B · Pink colour in F1 is due to incomplete dominance.
C · Ratio of F2 is 1/4 (Red) : 2/4 (Pink) : 1/4 (White)
D · Law of Segregation does not apply in this experiment
Solution: The incorrect statement is D. In incomplete dominance the alleles still segregate cleanly, so the Law of Segregation DOES apply, and the F2 genotype ratio is a normal 1 : 2 : 1. Only the Law of Dominance is broken, because R is not completely dominant over r, giving the intermediate pink heterozygote. So statements A, B and C are correct and D is the wrong one.

Solved Principles of Inheritance and Variation NEET PYQs

Try the real previous-year questions from this chapter — each with the answer and a full solution.

See all 65 Principles of Inheritance and Variation NEET PYQs ›
Next concept: Multiple Alleles and ABO Blood Group InheritanceKeep learning — 2 minFeeling ready? Solve the Principles of Inheritance and Variation NEET PYQs ›Or practice on your phone — get the free MedicNEET app ›

Frequently asked

Can one gene show both incomplete dominance and codominance?

Different alleles of the same gene can behave differently. In the ABO gene, I^A and I^B are codominant with each other, but each is completely dominant over i. So within one gene you can see complete dominance (I^A over i) and codominance (I^A with I^B). Incomplete dominance is a separate case seen in genes like snapdragon flower colour.

Is the F1 in codominance a mix of the two parents?

No. In codominance the F1 shows BOTH parent traits fully and separately, not a mix. NCERT says in codominance 'the F1 generation resembles both parents.' In incomplete dominance the F1 is an in-between blend that resembles NEITHER parent exactly (like pink). This resemblance rule is a fast way to tell them apart.

Why does incomplete dominance give a 1:2:1 ratio instead of 3:1?

In complete dominance, the heterozygote looks the same as one homozygote, so two genotypes share one look, giving 3:1. In incomplete dominance the heterozygote has its own unique look (pink), so each of the three genotypes RR, Rr, rr is visible separately. This makes the phenotype ratio 1:2:1, matching the genotype ratio.

Which is more important for NEET, the examples or the definitions?

Both, but the EXAMPLES win marks most often. NEET repeatedly tests 'Antirrhinum/snapdragon = incomplete dominance' and 'ABO blood group = codominance' in match-the-column and statement questions. Memorise these two example-to-term links exactly, and never swap them.