Why Does Relative Motion Between a Magnet and Coil Make Current?

Physics · Electromagnetic Induction · NEET

Relative motion makes current because it changes the magnetic flux (the amount of field lines) passing through the coil, and a changing flux is what drives an induced EMF. When the magnet and coil are still, the flux is fixed, so there is no current. Memory hook: "No change, no current" — the galvanometer deflects only while something is moving.
Moving magnet changes flux through the coil → current flowsCoilNSv (motion)field lines entering coil increaseGgalvanometerWhile the magnet moves, flux Φ rises → EMF = -N dΦ/dt drives current. Stop the magnet → Φ fixed → no current.
As the magnet moves toward the coil, more field lines pass through it each second, so the flux changes and a current is induced (galvanometer deflects). The moment the magnet stops, the flux stops changing and the current drops to zero.

Your doubts, answered

Why is there current only while the magnet moves, and not when it rests inside the coil?

Current needs a CHANGING flux, not just flux. While the magnet moves closer, more field lines pass through the coil each second, so flux keeps rising and an EMF is induced. Once the magnet stops (even inside the coil), the flux becomes a fixed number — it is not changing — so dΦ/dt = 0 and the galvanometer reads zero. This is exactly what NCERT's Faraday experiment shows: the deflection lasts only as long as the magnet is in motion.

Does the magnet have to move, or can I move the coil instead?

Only RELATIVE motion matters. You get the same current whether you push the magnet toward a fixed coil, or push the coil toward a fixed magnet. In both cases the flux through the coil changes at the same rate. Physics only cares that the magnet and coil are moving relative to each other, not which one you label as 'moving'.

Why does a faster push or a stronger magnet give a bigger deflection?

Induced EMF equals the RATE of change of flux (EMF = -N dΦ/dt). A faster push changes the flux in less time, so dΦ/dt is larger and EMF is bigger. A stronger magnet means more field lines to begin with, so each bit of motion changes the flux more. Both increase dΦ/dt, so both give a bigger galvanometer deflection.

So is it the motion or the changing flux that really causes the current?

The changing flux is the real cause; motion is just one easy way to change it. Faraday proved this with a third experiment: two coils held completely still, where switching a current on/off in one coil (changing its field) induced a current in the other coil with no motion at all. Motion is not required — a changing flux is.

Why does the deflection reverse when I pull the magnet out?

Pushing the magnet in makes flux INCREASE; pulling it out makes flux DECREASE. The induced current always flows in the direction that opposes the change (Lenz's law), so an increasing flux and a decreasing flux drive current in opposite directions. That is why the galvanometer needle swings the other way when you reverse the motion.

⚠️ The NEET trap
Current flows because the magnet is near the coil, so a magnet resting inside the coil keeps a current flowing.
Current flows only while the flux is CHANGING. A magnet resting inside the coil gives a large but constant flux, so dΦ/dt = 0 and the current is zero.
🧠 Nearness stores flux; only CHANGE makes current. Ask yourself: is dΦ/dt zero or not?

Real NEET questions

NEET 2024

A strong bar magnet is moving towards solenoid-2 from solenoid-1 (the two solenoids lie along the same axis). The directions of the induced current in solenoid-1 and in solenoid-2, respectively, are along:

A · BA and CD
B · AB and CD
C · BA and DC
D · AB and DC
Solution: This is pure relative-motion induction judged by Lenz's law. As the magnet (N-pole facing right, toward solenoid-2) moves away from solenoid-1, the flux through solenoid-1 decreases, so solenoid-1 drives current to OPPOSE the decrease (it tries to pull the magnet back, presenting a South face to the receding N-pole) → current along AB. At the same time the magnet approaches solenoid-2, so its flux increases; solenoid-2 opposes the approach by presenting a North face to the incoming N-pole → current along DC. Combining, the induced currents are AB and DC, option D. Key idea: current exists in both coils only because the magnet is MOVING, which changes the flux in each coil.

Solved Electromagnetic Induction NEET PYQs

Try the real previous-year questions from this chapter — each with the answer and a full solution.

See all 16 Electromagnetic Induction NEET PYQs ›
Next concept: What is Magnetic Flux? Meaning, Formula and SI Unit (Weber)Keep learning — 2 minFeeling ready? Solve the Electromagnetic Induction NEET PYQs ›Or practice on your phone — get the free MedicNEET app ›

Frequently asked

What is the single reason relative motion makes current?

Relative motion changes the magnetic flux through the coil, and a changing flux induces an EMF (Faraday's law). No change in flux means no current.

Will a stationary magnet ever induce current in a coil?

No, not by itself. A stationary magnet gives a constant flux, so dΦ/dt = 0 and there is no induced EMF. You must change something — move the magnet, move the coil, or change the field.

Is motion the only way to induce current?

No. Faraday's third experiment used two stationary coils; switching the current in one coil on or off changed its magnetic field and induced current in the other coil. Any changing flux works — motion is just the most common way.

Why does the galvanometer deflect in opposite directions when the magnet goes in versus out?

Going in increases the flux; coming out decreases it. By Lenz's law the induced current opposes the change, so increasing and decreasing flux produce currents in opposite directions.

How is this different from motional EMF?

Here the whole coil experiences a changing flux because the source (magnet) moves. Motional EMF is a special case where a conductor of length l moves with speed v through a steady field, giving EMF = Bvl. Both trace back to a changing flux.