Electric Potential Due to an Electric Dipole (Derivation)

Physics · Electrostatic Potential And Capacitance · NEET

For a short electric dipole, the electric potential at a point at distance r making angle θ with the dipole axis is V = kp cosθ / r², where k = 1/(4πε₀) and p is the dipole moment. Notice the potential falls as 1/r² (faster than a single point charge, which falls as 1/r). Memory hook: "dipole potential = p cosθ over r-squared" — the cosθ makes it maximum on the axis and zero on the equator.
dipole axis-q+q2aPrθV = k p cosθ / r²θ = 0° axis: V = kp/r²θ = 90° equator: V = 0centre of dipole at midpoint of 2a
Point P at distance r and angle θ from a short dipole (-q to +q). Potential V = kp cosθ / r²: maximum on the axis (θ = 0°), zero on the equatorial line (θ = 90°).

Your doubts, answered

Why does dipole potential vary as 1/r² but a point charge as 1/r?

A single point charge has potential V = kq/r, falling as 1/r. A dipole is +q and -q very close together. Far away their potentials almost cancel, and only the tiny difference (because +q and -q are at slightly different distances) survives. This leftover difference falls off faster, as 1/r². So the dipole potential dies out quicker than a point charge because the two opposite charges nearly cancel.

What exactly is the angle θ in V = kp cosθ / r²?

θ is the angle between the dipole axis (direction of the dipole moment vector p, which points from -q to +q) and the line joining the centre of the dipole to the point P where you measure potential. When θ = 0° the point is on the axis (nearer the +q side), when θ = 90° it is on the equatorial line.

Why is the potential zero on the equatorial line?

On the equatorial line θ = 90°, so cosθ = 0, giving V = 0. Physically, the point is equally far from +q and -q, so the positive potential from +q exactly cancels the negative potential from -q. The net potential is zero even though the electric field there is not zero.

Is electric potential due to a dipole a scalar or a vector?

Potential is always a scalar. You do NOT add potentials like vectors. You simply add the arithmetic values V₊ = +kq/r₊ and V₋ = -kq/r₋. Only the direction of the point (through cosθ) matters, not vector addition. This is why dipole potential problems are usually easier than dipole field problems.

Why do we assume the dipole is 'short' (r >> a)?

The exact potential involves the two distances r₊ and r₋ separately. When the point P is far compared to the dipole size (r >> 2a, where 2a is the separation), we approximate r₊ ≈ r - a cosθ and r₋ ≈ r + a cosθ. This lets the two terms combine neatly into V = kp cosθ / r². For NEET, almost every dipole is treated as 'short'.

⚠️ The NEET trap
Using V = 2kp / r² for every axial dipole point (copying the axial FIELD formula E = 2kp/r³ pattern with an extra factor of 2).
Axial potential is V = kp / r² (θ = 0, cosθ = 1). There is NO factor of 2 in the potential. The factor of 2 belongs to the axial electric FIELD, not the potential. This exact trap appeared in NEET 2024 Assertion-Reason.
🧠 Field has the 2, potential does not. Potential of a dipole is just kp cosθ / r².

Real NEET questions

NEET 2020

A short electric dipole has a dipole moment of 16 × 10⁻⁹ C·m. The electric potential due to the dipole at a point at distance 0.6 m from the centre, on a line making 60° with the dipole axis, is (1/4πε₀ = 9 × 10⁹ N·m²/C²):

A · 400 V
B · Zero
C · 50 V
D · 200 V
Solution: Use V = kp cosθ / r². Here k = 9×10⁹, p = 16×10⁻⁹ C·m, θ = 60° so cos60° = 0.5, r = 0.6 m. Numerator = 9×10⁹ × 16×10⁻⁹ × 0.5 = 144 × 0.5 = 72. Denominator r² = 0.6² = 0.36. V = 72 / 0.36 = 200 V. Answer: 200 V (D).
NEET 2024

Assertion A: The potential at an axial point at 2 m from the centre of a dipole of moment 4 × 10⁻⁶ C·m is ±9 × 10³ V (1/4πε₀ = 9 × 10⁹ SI units). Reason R: V = ±2P/(4πε₀ r²) for any axial point at 2 m from the centre.

A · Both A and R true, R NOT the correct explanation of A
B · A true but R false
C · A false but R true
D · Both A and R true, R is the correct explanation of A
Solution: Check A: V_axial = kp/r² = (9×10⁹)(4×10⁻⁶)/(2²) = 36×10³/4 = 9×10³ V. So A is TRUE. Check R: it writes V = ±2P/(4πε₀ r²), with an extra factor of 2. The correct axial potential has NO factor of 2 (only the field does). So R is FALSE. Correct choice: A true but R false (B). This is the classic 'factor of 2' trap.
NEET 2025

A dipole of moment 5 × 10⁻⁶ C·m is aligned with a uniform field of 4 × 10⁵ N/C. It is then rotated by 60° from the field. The change in potential energy of the dipole is:

A · 1.2 J
B · 1.5 J
C · 0.8 J
D · 1.0 J
Solution: Potential energy of a dipole in a field: U = -pE cosθ. ΔU = -pE(cosθ₂ - cosθ₁) = -pE(cos60° - cos0°) = -pE(0.5 - 1) = 0.5 pE. Here pE = (5×10⁻⁶)(4×10⁵) = 2 J. ΔU = 0.5 × 2 = 1.0 J. Answer: 1.0 J (D). (Note: this uses dipole potential ENERGY, a close companion of dipole potential.)

Solved Electrostatic Potential And Capacitance NEET PYQs

Try the real previous-year questions from this chapter — each with the answer and a full solution.

See all 32 Electrostatic Potential And Capacitance NEET PYQs ›
Next concept: Dipole Potential on Axial vs Equatorial PointKeep learning — 2 minFeeling ready? Solve the Electrostatic Potential And Capacitance NEET PYQs ›Or practice on your phone — get the free MedicNEET app ›

Frequently asked

What is the formula for electric potential due to a short dipole?

V = kp cosθ / r², where k = 1/(4πε₀) = 9×10⁹ SI units, p is the dipole moment, r is the distance from the centre, and θ is the angle between the dipole axis and the line to the point.

What is the potential on the axial line of a dipole?

On the axis θ = 0°, so cosθ = 1 and V = kp / r². It is positive on the +q side and negative on the -q side. There is no factor of 2 (unlike the axial field).

What is the potential on the equatorial line of a dipole?

On the equatorial line θ = 90°, cosθ = 0, so V = 0. The point is equally distant from +q and -q, so their potentials cancel exactly.

How is dipole potential different from point charge potential?

A point charge gives V = kq/r (falls as 1/r) and does not depend on direction. A dipole gives V = kp cosθ/r² (falls as 1/r², faster) and depends on the angle θ.

Do we add dipole potentials as vectors?

No. Potential is a scalar. We add the numbers V₊ = +kq/r₊ and V₋ = -kq/r₋ arithmetically. This is why dipole potential is simpler to compute than dipole field.