Stopping Potential vs Frequency Graph

Physics · Dual Nature Of Radiation And Matter · NEET

The stopping potential (V0) versus frequency (nu) graph is a STRAIGHT LINE. Its equation is V0 = (h/e)nu - (phi/e). So the slope = h/e (same for every metal), the x-axis cut = threshold frequency nu0, and the y-axis cut = -phi/e (below zero). Memory hook: "Slope tells Planck, x-cut tells the door frequency, y-cut tells the work."
Frequency nu (Hz)Stopping potential V0y-cut = -phi/enu0 (threshold)slope = h/eV0 = (h/e)nu - phi/e
Stopping potential V0 vs frequency nu is a straight line. Solid part starts at the threshold frequency nu0 (green x-intercept); the dashed red extension meets the axis at y = -phi/e. The slope h/e is the same for every metal, so lines for different metals are parallel.

Your doubts, answered

Why is the stopping potential vs frequency graph a straight line?

Start from Einstein's equation: eV0 = h(nu) - phi. Divide both sides by e: V0 = (h/e)nu - (phi/e). This is in the form y = mx + c, which is the equation of a straight line. Here y = V0, x = nu, slope m = h/e, and intercept c = -(phi/e). Because h, e and phi are all constants for a given metal, V0 rises straight up as nu increases. That is why the plot is a clean straight line, not a curve.

What is the slope of the stopping potential vs frequency graph?

The slope is h/e, where h is Planck's constant (6.63 x 10^-34 J s) and e is the electron charge (1.6 x 10^-19 C). So slope = 6.63e-34 / 1.6e-19 = 4.14 x 10^-15 volt-second. This is a UNIVERSAL constant. It does not depend on the metal, the intensity, or the light source. This is the key idea used to find Planck's constant from the graph.

Does the slope change for different metals?

No. The slope stays h/e for every metal, so all the lines are PARALLEL. What changes from metal to metal is the position of the line: a metal with a higher work function (phi) has a larger threshold frequency nu0, so its line is shifted to the RIGHT and starts further along the frequency axis. Same slope, different starting point.

What does the x-intercept mean on this graph?

The x-intercept (where the line crosses the frequency axis, V0 = 0) is the threshold frequency nu0. At V0 = 0, Einstein's equation gives h(nu0) = phi, so nu0 = phi/h. Below nu0 no electrons are emitted, so the real graph only starts from nu0. To the left of nu0 the line is just a dashed extension used to read the intercept.

Why is the y-intercept negative?

Set nu = 0 in V0 = (h/e)nu - (phi/e). You get V0 = -(phi/e), which is negative because phi and e are positive. So the extended line meets the V0 axis BELOW zero at -(phi/e). This point has no physical meaning on its own (you cannot have zero frequency light), but its magnitude gives you the work function: phi = e x (magnitude of y-intercept).

How is this different from the maximum kinetic energy vs frequency graph?

They look almost the same, but the y-axis differs. KE(max) vs nu has slope h and y-intercept -phi. V0 vs nu has slope h/e and y-intercept -phi/e (because V0 = KE(max)/e). Both cross the frequency axis at the SAME threshold frequency nu0. So use slope h for the energy graph and slope h/e for the stopping potential graph.

⚠️ The NEET trap
Reading the slope as h (Planck's constant) directly from the stopping potential vs frequency graph.
The slope of V0 vs nu is h/e, NOT h. To get h you must multiply the slope by e: h = slope x e. The slope of h alone belongs to the KE(max) vs nu graph.
🧠 Stopping potential graph slope has an e hiding under it: slope = h/e, so h = slope x e.

Real NEET questions

2022

When two monochromatic lights of frequency nu and nu/2 are incident on a photoelectric metal, their stopping potentials become Vs/2 and Vs respectively. The threshold frequency for this metal is:

A · 2 nu
B · 3 nu
C · (2/3) nu
D · (3/2) nu
Solution: Use eV0 = h(nu - nu0), which is the straight-line relation. Case 1 (frequency nu, stopping potential Vs/2): e(Vs/2) = h(nu - nu0). Case 2 (frequency nu/2, stopping potential Vs): e(Vs) = h(nu/2 - nu0). Divide Case 1 by Case 2 to remove e, h and Vs: (Vs/2)/Vs = (nu - nu0)/(nu/2 - nu0) 1/2 = (nu - nu0)/(nu/2 - nu0). Cross-multiply: (nu/2 - nu0) = 2(nu - nu0). nu/2 - nu0 = 2nu - 2nu0. 2nu0 - nu0 = 2nu - nu/2. nu0 = (3/2) nu. Note: the lower frequency nu/2 gave the HIGHER stopping potential, which is physically impossible for a real single metal, so this is a formula-application question. The algebra gives nu0 = (3/2) nu, option D.

Solved Dual Nature Of Radiation And Matter NEET PYQs

Try the real previous-year questions from this chapter — each with the answer and a full solution.

See all 28 Dual Nature Of Radiation And Matter NEET PYQs ›
Next concept: How to Find Planck's Constant from the GraphKeep learning — 2 minFeeling ready? Solve the Dual Nature Of Radiation And Matter NEET PYQs ›Or practice on your phone — get the free MedicNEET app ›

Frequently asked

What is the equation of the stopping potential vs frequency graph?

V0 = (h/e)nu - (phi/e). It comes from Einstein's photoelectric equation eV0 = h(nu) - phi divided by e. It is a straight line with slope h/e and y-intercept -(phi/e).

What does the slope of the graph give?

The slope equals h/e = 4.14 x 10^-15 V s. Multiply the slope by the electron charge e to get Planck's constant: h = slope x e.

What do the intercepts represent?

The x-intercept (V0 = 0) is the threshold frequency nu0 = phi/h. The y-intercept is -(phi/e); its magnitude times e gives the work function phi.

Why are the graphs for different metals parallel?

Because the slope h/e is the same for all metals. Only the threshold frequency changes, so a higher work function metal shifts its line to the right while keeping the same slope.

Where does the real graph actually begin?

The physical line starts from the threshold frequency nu0 on the frequency axis. Below nu0 there is no emission and no stopping potential, so that part is only a dashed extension for reading the y-intercept.