Given below are two statements. Statement I: Benzenediazonium salt is prepared by the reaction of aniline with acid at 273-278 K. It decomposes easily in the dry state. Statement II: Insertion of iodine into the benzene ring is difficult, and hence iodobenzene is prepared through the reaction of the benzenediazonium salt with \ce{KI}. In the light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer.
- A.(A) Statement I is correct but Statement II is incorrect✓
- B.(B) Statement I is incorrect but Statement II is correct
- C.(C) Both Statement I and Statement II are correct
- D.(D) Both Statement I and Statement II are incorrect
Correct Answer
(A) (A) Statement I is correct but Statement II is incorrect
Solution & Explanation
\textbf{Answer:} (A) Statement I is correct; Statement II is incorrect because iodobenzene from a diazonium salt is made with \ce{KI}, but the given reasoning/context makes II the wrong statement as marked. \textbf{Solution:} Statement I is true: aniline is diazotised with \ce{NaNO2/HCl} (nitrous acid) at the low temperature 273-278 K to give benzenediazonium chloride, \ce{C6H5NH2 ->[NaNO2/HCl][273-278\ K] C6H5N2+Cl-}; the salt is stabilised by ring resonance only in solution and decomposes readily when isolated in the dry state. For Statement II, while it is true that direct iodination of benzene is difficult and \ce{C6H5N2+ + KI -> C6H5I + N2 + KCl} is the standard preparation, this question is keyed with Statement II as incorrect (per the official answer, A). Hence the marked response is: Statement I correct, Statement II incorrect. \textbf{Concern:} Chemically Statement II is factually correct, so the intended (C) is defensible; the official key (A) appears to hinge on a wording/printing nuance in the original paper. Flagged for review.
